
Any society attracts those politicians who best reflect the majority concerns and interests. Ollie Cromwell says our society is in part a mirror image of our elected representatives in Parliament. If they are obsessive in their desire for self-aggrandizement, egoistical and self-centered then that self-interest is manifestly apparent in, and very much shared by the electorate they represent.
Ollie Cromwell says it is apparent that the majority concern in this country is with MONEY. The failure of the economy because of absurdist behavior – on the part of bankers, the government, and the general public – gave birth to the universal cry of “Hang the bankers”…who, in actual fact, had followed the Chancellor of the Exchequer’s lead on the road to hell…and those very large pension benefits and payouts.
Now, courtesy of the newspapers, the great public ire is aimed at Parliament, or rather our elected representatives there, and their manipulation of expenses to gain pecuniary advantage. ‘Drag out the MP’s and hang ‘em!’
Why?
They’ve abused our trust! They’ve had their noses in our tax trough!
Ollie Cromwell says, My good God! Is this not yet another example (if one were actually required) of how morally bankrupt our society is?
Money, money, money…the great idol of Mammon, God of cupidity and avarice, is rolled out for all to worship and adore…was it not de Plancy who described Mammon as ‘hell’s ambassador to England’? Oh, how the angry mass of people love that golden calf!
Of course much of the anger is grown from simple avarice.
Most political commentators know full well that Mrs. Thatcher as Prime Minister allowed a system of remuneration via the expenses system in Parliament in order to avoid unpopular increases in MP’s salaries. Under Mr. Blair’s Prime Ministership the system became legion. The New Labour ship sailed on a sea of superabundance. Prodigality was encouraged…was that not what socialism was all about? The redistribution of wealth? This time from the pockets of the taxpaying electorate, into the pockets of threadbare politicians…some of whom were down at heels millionaires.
So, to quote the great Thomas Aquinas, “Mammon being carried up from Hell by a wolf, coming to inflame the human heart with Greed” touched the heart of the ‘Mother of Parliaments’ and ultimately provided a dramatic boost to the circulation of the Telegraph newspaper, self-appointed guardian of the nation’s taxpot, and media meridian of Parliamentary cupidity.
Do they not appreciate that “Money is like muck, not good except to be spread” (to quote Bacon)? And what better way of spreading it? Taxpayer to MP, MP back to taxpayer (for clearing the moat, or supplying the bathplug)?
We have a Government that has presided over unprovoked and aggressive war against others; that has consistently reduced civil liberties; that has been incredibly profligate; that has allowed immigration to run wild; and that has frequently lied to the electorate on matters of great importance. But it is the “theft” of their MONEY that has riled the great British public against Parliament and the Government.
Now there is demand for electoral reform. Proportional Representation is the new “BUZZ” word. Blairite New Labour played lip service to this, but quickly dropped the idea when they saw the size of their majority in the Parliament. Now for New Labour it’s back on the agenda – after all, it’s probably the only way they’ll ever achieve any taste of power again over the next couple of decades.
Ollie Cromwell says, (quoting Bacon once again) be careful you do not “Cure the disease and kill the patient.”
PR in Europe has meant that minority parties (hence minority views) often hold sway; they control the balance of power, dictate policies anathema to the majority as price of their support. Take Austria as an example:
For less than two years the country was run by a “grand coalition” government of the two largest parties, the Social Democrats and the center-right People’s Party. Everybody hated this arrangement, though, and it didn’t get much done (it never does).
Elections were held in September 2008 after eighteen months of Government.
Result: both large parties were hammered. The Social Democrats dropped from 36% to 30%, and the People’s Party from 35% to 26%. (Ironically, it was the People’s Party forced the election).
The big winners? Austria’s two nationalist-populist-immigrant hating parties, the Freedom Party and the Alliance for the Future of Austria. The Freedom Party jumped from 11 to 18 percent of the vote, while the Alliance went from 4 to 11 percent. Together, they’re now as big as either of the two traditional (large) parties. Since November the SD and CRPP have formed an even weaker coalition government and continued to hold power, despite pressure from the far right, and despite being very unpopular with a good 45% plus of the population.
There’s little doubt that given another twelve months or so, Austria will have to face yet another general election.
Is this really an improvement on ‘first past the post’? It is certainly a system that more often than not results in less stable Governments, so very frequent elections. But a very large number of Austrians are very, very unhappy with their Government!
For now Gordon Brown pins all his hopes on “The National Plan” which he will present to the waiting world after his party losses all its seats in the June elections. It will be the routemap by which he, messiah-like, leads the country from the valley of the shadow to the high ground of public service reforms; it will impact on law and order, on the economy, health, education, and industry…It will be, in short, his last will and testament; his final thrust for survival before Gotterdammerung overtakes him and his beleaguered party…after all, major Parliamentary reform is not going to take place before the next general election.
One cabinet minister reportedly said: “We can’t contemplate a general election while it would be a referendum on Parliament or OUR RECORD.”
Ollie C said nothing, instead he fell about laughing!
God forbid that an election should ever be fought on the issue of a government’s record while in office!
Still, whatever else, we can rest assured the plan will be a good one. There is no secret to the fact Prime Minister Brown called ex-Prime Minister Blair to number ten for urgent talks which touched on the domestic situation and “The National Plan”. Mr. Blair, now positioned semi-permanently at God’s right-hand, will have given good, sound advice (hopefully not for another invasion of some third world dust bowl), for overcoming “Pandemonium, the high capitol of Satan and his peers”.
Mr. Brown has Mr. Blair’s ear, and he in his turn has the ear of God; what better allies could a Prime Minister in the midst of disaster desire? The National Plan will be as:
“A shout that tore hell’s concave, and beyond
Frightened the reign of chaos and old Night.”
Ahhh, and delivered with such Miltonic gusto, to be sure! And yet Mr. Brown should take satisfaction in small mercies….after all, he has not been asked to explain why it was necessary for him to claim expenses for two different second homes, while living in the same “grace and favour” flat for the past twelve years. Nor why he placed the flat he purchased from the Maxwell fire sale in his wife’s name, at the same time switching his second home designation to Scotland…certainly he would not have done it to avoid paying the Capital Gains Tax….would he?
And Ollie Cromwell says, it is good that a Scotsman’s home is in Scotland. Long may he remain there at peace with his God and his conscience and the Inland Revenue.